The Commission has started preexaminations already some time ago, based on complaints of several bookmakers, which were effectively barred to enter the market. The complaints concern in particular the prohibition of advertising sports betting services (in Germany a criminal offence according to Art. 284 par. 3 German Criminal Code) and the prohibition of placing bets with a bookmaker, licensed in an other Member State (in Germany, customers are committing a crime according to Art. 285 German Criminal Code). Internal Market Commissioner Charlie McCreevy argued that the Commission felt obliged to respond, having received a number of complaints from operators in the area of sports betting. The Commission had the obligation to check that member States´ legislation is compatible with EU law.
The letters of formal notice are the first step in an infringement procedure under Article 226 of the EC Treaty. The Member States in question now have two months in which to respond.
In its announcement, the Commission referred to the recent case law by the European Court of Justice, according to which any restrictions of the free movement of services had to be justified by general interest objectives and must be consistent and systematic in how they seek to limit betting activities. According to the Gambelli decision a Member States cannot invoke the need to restrict betting services to customers if at the same time it incites and encourages them to participate in state lotteries, games of chance or betting.
As „Guardian of the Treaties“ the Commission now felt obliged to inquire about the free movement of services regarding sports betting, which has evolved into a billion Euros business. In view of the criminal proceedings against bookmakers licensed and regulated in an other Member State, this decision was overdue.
The restrictions of the free movement of services with regard to sports betting in Germany will now be formally reviewed. The situation for Germany is not really enjoyable as the Federal Constitutional Court held, in its review under German constitutional law, that the regulation was not coherent and that sports betting was marketed as a „generally harmless leisure activity“, mainly motivated by (irrelevant) fiscal reasons. The legislation in Germany is therefore not justified under Community law, as the state operators did not care about fighting gaming addiction. If the matter is not resolved, the Commission might ask the European Court of Justice to review the legal situation.
For further questions regarding sports betting services and Community law attorney-at-law Martin Arendts is at your disposition (Tel. +49 / 0700 / WETTRECHT).